We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and quality. Our review process is designed to ensure that every manuscript meets our rigorous standards for originality, relevance, and scholarly excellence.
Authors can submit their manuscripts using our online submission platform. Each submission is first reviewed by the editorial team to ensure it aligns with the scope and guidelines of the journal.
The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors conduct an initial assessment to determine whether the manuscript is suitable for peer review. Manuscripts that do not meet the required standards or fall outside the journal's scope may be desk-rejected at this stage.
If the manuscript passes the editorial assessment, it is sent to at least two expert reviewers for a double-blind peer review. Reviewers are chosen for their specialized knowledge in the relevant field. The review process typically focuses on the following criteria:
Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations, which can include:
Authors will receive anonymized reviewer comments to help them understand the feedback and make necessary revisions.
Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscripts based on the reviewers' feedback. Revised manuscripts are then resubmitted and may be subject to further review.
The editorial team makes the final decision based on the reviewers' recommendations and the quality of the revisions. The authors are informed of the decision, which may include the following options:
Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes a final round of proofreading and formatting before it is published online.
We encourage ongoing dialogue and engagement with published works. Authors can respond to post-publication comments and discussions on our platform.
© 2025 Meteor Publishing Journals All Rights Reserved