Review Process

Authorship Requirements

We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and quality. Our review process is designed to ensure that every manuscript meets our rigorous standards for originality, relevance, and scholarly excellence.

Review Process
1

Initial Submission

Authors can submit their manuscripts using our online submission platform. Each submission is first reviewed by the editorial team to ensure it aligns with the scope and guidelines of the journal.

2

Editorial Assessment

The Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors conduct an initial assessment to determine whether the manuscript is suitable for peer review. Manuscripts that do not meet the required standards or fall outside the journal's scope may be desk-rejected at this stage.

3

Peer Review

If the manuscript passes the editorial assessment, it is sent to at least two expert reviewers for a double-blind peer review. Reviewers are chosen for their specialized knowledge in the relevant field. The review process typically focuses on the following criteria:

  • Originality: Is the work novel and does it add to the existing body of knowledge?
  • Methodology: Are the methods used appropriate and well-executed?
  • Significance: Does the research have a significant impact on the field?
  • Clarity: Is the manuscript composed effectively and presented with clear articulation?
  • Ethical Considerations: Does the research adhere to ethical guidelines?
4

Reviewer Feedback

Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommendations, which can include:

  • Accept without revision
  • Minor revisions required
  • Major revisions required
  • Reject

Authors will receive anonymized reviewer comments to help them understand the feedback and make necessary revisions.

5

Revision and Resubmission

Authors are given the opportunity to revise their manuscripts based on the reviewers' feedback. Revised manuscripts are then resubmitted and may be subject to further review.

6

Final Decision

The editorial team makes the final decision based on the reviewers' recommendations and the quality of the revisions. The authors are informed of the decision, which may include the following options:

  • Accept for publication
  • Reject
7

Proofreading and Publication

Once accepted, the manuscript undergoes a final round of proofreading and formatting before it is published online.

8

Post-Publication

We encourage ongoing dialogue and engagement with published works. Authors can respond to post-publication comments and discussions on our platform.

Communication with the Editor

  • Focused Feedback: Concentrate your report on the critical elements of the article, steering clear of unnecessary details.
  • Alignment with Journal Standards: Ensure your review is in harmony with the journal's guidelines and expectations.
  • Timely Submission: Submit your review to the editor without delay, following the required submission procedures.
  • Thorough Recommendations: Offer clear and comprehensive advice to the editor, including whether the article should be accepted, revised, or rejected, based on both specific and general aspects of the manuscript.

Peer-Review Deadline

  • On-Time Review: Strive to complete the review and provide your recommendations within the allotted 7-day period.
  • Upholding Professionalism: Meeting deadlines reflects your professionalism and supports timely publication, which benefits both authors and the academic community.

Contact Info:

© 2025 Meteor Publishing Journals All Rights Reserved